For U.S. immigration attorneys, a Request for Evidence (RFE) is more than a routine notice. It disrupts timelines, increases workload, and creates uncertainty for both the firm and the client.
What makes RFEs particularly frustrating is that many occur in cases that are otherwise approvable. The issue is often not eligibility. It is how clearly eligibility is demonstrated in the petition. Missing evidence, conflicting information, or unclear explanations can prevent adjudicators from confirming qualification quickly.
This is where artificial intelligence (AI) is beginning to reshape immigration practice. By reviewing petitions before filing and identifying common risk patterns, AI helps attorneys strengthen submissions and reduce preventable RFEs.
This article explains why RFEs occur, where they originate in petition preparation, and how AI-assisted review helps immigration attorneys reduce RFE risk in real workflows.
Why RFEs Happen
In daily practice, attorneys frequently see RFEs issued in cases that meet statutory requirements. The problem is rarely that the beneficiary does not qualify. Instead, adjudicators cannot clearly confirm eligibility based on the filing as presented.
Across immigration petitions, the most common RFE triggers include:
- Missing or insufficient supporting evidence
- Inconsistent information across forms and letters
- Job duties are not clearly aligned with the classification
- Qualifications not fully documented
- Timeline or status gaps
The Limits of Manual Petition Review
Immigration petitions are document-dense. A single filing may include forms, employer letters, contracts, degrees, evaluations, pay records, passports, and prior approvals. The same data, names, dates, titles, and wages appear repeatedly across materials.
Even careful legal teams face challenges:
- Reviewing hundreds of pages under deadlines
- Tracking repeated data across documents
- Confirming consistency across versions
- Ensuring all evidence categories are present
Human review is strong at legal reasoning but less reliable at large-scale cross-document comparison. This is exactly where preventable RFE triggers arise.
How AI Fits Into Petition Preparation
AI simply adds an extra layer of review before filing, helping ensure the petition is complete, consistent, and well-organized.
AI systems analyze:
- Form data
- Supporting documents
- Extracted document data
- Timelines and relationships
- Evidence categories
The goal is simple: detect gaps or inconsistencies before USCIS does.
Where AI Most Effectively Reduces RFEs
AI reduces RFEs most significantly in areas where petition quality depends on consistency, completeness, and clear alignment across multiple documents. These are the stages where manual review is most time-intensive and where preventable gaps most often occur.
-
Detecting Cross-Document Inconsistencies
Inconsistencies are among the most common RFE triggers. They often arise because the same information appears across multiple documents prepared at different times.
Examples attorneys frequently encounter:
- The job title differs between the LCA and the petition letter
- Salary varies across employer documents
- Employment dates conflict
- Name spelling varies across forms
These discrepancies may be minor, but to adjudicators they raise credibility concerns.
AI compares structured data across all petition materials simultaneously. When values differ, the system flags them before filing.
Impact: Attorneys resolve inconsistencies early, preventing RFEs based on conflicting information.
-
Ensuring Evidence Completeness
Another major RFE driver is missing or insufficient required evidence. Even experienced teams occasionally overlook items when handling large caseloads.
Examples:
- Specialty occupation cases missing detailed duty evidence
- Multinational petitions lacking relationship documentation
- Experience letters lacking specificity
- Status maintenance records incomplete
AI maps each petition type to expected evidence categories and checks whether each category is present.
This does not judge legal sufficiency. It ensures nothing essential is absent.
Impact: Fewer RFEs requesting documents that could have been included initially.
-
Strengthening Eligibility Presentation
Some RFEs arise because adjudicators cannot clearly connect role, qualifications, and classification even when eligibility exists.
Common situations:
- Duties described too broadly
- Wage level is inconsistent with complexity
- Education relevance unclear
- Experience not clearly tied to role
AI analyzes petition content and flags weak alignment patterns commonly associated with RFEs. Attorneys can then clarify duties, requirements, or supporting explanations before filing.
Impact: Eligibility is demonstrated more clearly, reducing clarification RFEs.
-
Validating Timelines and Status History
Immigration petitions rely heavily on accurate chronology. Even small timeline errors can create major adjudication questions.
Typical issues:
- Gaps in status history
- Overlapping employment periods
- Incorrect maintenance timelines
- Expired documents referenced
AI reconstructs timelines across forms and evidence and identifies gaps or conflicts.
Impact: Fewer RFEs related to maintenance of status or employment history.
-
Matching Petition Data to Source Documents
Manual data entry remains a quiet source of RFE risk. Minor transcription errors can undermine credibility.
Examples:
- Incorrect passport number
- Date mismatch with I-94
- Name variation from the passport
- Approval notice data entered incorrectly
AI extraction tools read data directly from documents and compare it with petition entries. Differences are flagged automatically.
Impact: Forms match source documents precisely, eliminating avoidable discrepancies.
Final Thoughts
Most RFEs are not inevitable. They arise from documentation gaps, inconsistencies, or unclear eligibility presentation, issues that occur during petition preparation, not adjudication.
AI-assisted petition analysis addresses these risks before filing. By detecting inconsistencies, missing evidence, timeline errors, and weak alignment early, AI helps attorneys submit clearer and more complete petitions.
As immigration practices manage growing caseloads and increasing documentation complexity, pre-submission AI review is becoming an essential tool for reducing RFE risk and improving filing outcomes.
